Lucid: In Dreams (2025)

September 1–October 1, 2025

Lucid: In Dreams (2025) was a juried online photography exhibition at TCG Gallery, on view September 1 through October 1, 2025, presenting 35 works by 34 artists from eleven countries. The subject is the territory between observation and imagination, the moment where a photograph stops reading as a record and starts reading as something remembered wrong.

Dreams are difficult to photograph for an obvious reason. They cannot be pointed at. Every artist here had to build the condition rather than find it, or find something in the waking world that already carried it. Dmitry Ersler submitted The Gateway No. 1: Into the Unknown from Bangkok. Marie Sueur printed on hahnemuhle torchon paper and embroidered it with gold thread. Kevin Vogrin titled a 2014 work Deja vu No. 3. Nilofer Khan submitted The Colour of Solitude from Mumbai. Cheng Gong submitted Sea of Devourment No. 3, the largest print in the exhibition at 42 by 27.4 inches.

The exhibition is unusually international, with work arriving from Thailand, Spain, Romania, India, China, France, Israel, Germany, the Czech Republic, Italy, and across the United States. It remains permanently available in the TCG Gallery photography exhibition archive.

Featured Artists

Amy Heller, Cathleen Trainor, Cheng Gong, Cyrille Parry, Damien Smith, Darrell O’Sullivan, Dmitry Ersler, Dominic Lippillo, Elya Kezene, Erica Sloan, Florin Firimita, Geneveive Selph, Holly April Harris, Iuliana Pasca, Jeff Wiles, Jingyi Zhang, Joseph Geyer, Kevin Vogrin, Kylo-Patrick Hart, Lawrence Manning, Marie Sueur, Matthew Sims, Maureen Lohan Bremer, Michael Prais, Nilofer Khan, Nouralrabee Mohammad, Pedro Ros, Ruben Calderon, Stephen Sheffield, Sue Anderson, Susan Borowitz, Svitlana Zinovieva, Wright Schickli, Z. Vladanovic

Lucidity Is a Question of Control

A dream becomes lucid when the dreamer notices it is a dream and does not wake. The interesting part is what follows: awareness does not end the dream, it changes the dreamer's relationship to it from passenger to participant. That shift describes something photographers do routinely. A picture made in full knowledge of its own artifice behaves differently from one that pretends to have found what it in fact arranged, and the thirty-five works here occupy that middle condition.

Knowing You Are Dreaming Changes What You Do

Laboratory work in the late 1970s established that lucid dreamers could signal awareness to observers while still asleep, which turned a reported experience into a measurable one. The technique that induces it is mundane: reality testing, the habit of checking whether the environment behaves consistently. Photographers working in this territory tend to build the same test into the picture — one element that will not hold up under inspection, placed where a viewer will find it on the second pass rather than the first. The image invites belief and then quietly withdraws it.

Staged, Found, Processed

There are three routes to dream imagery and they carry different obligations. Staging builds the impossible scene in front of the camera, which is laborious and honest, since the viewer can see that a decision was made. Finding relies on the world producing its own anomalies, which is cheap and rare and yields the most convincing results when it works. Processing constructs after the fact, and is the most flexible and the easiest to overuse, because the absence of physical constraint removes the discipline that constraint supplies. This catalog contains all three, and the route is usually identifiable.

A Shared Vocabulary Across Many Countries

Dream imagery travels unusually well. Exhibitions on this theme reliably assemble work from many countries that turns out to share a narrow set of situations: falling, being pursued, an empty version of a familiar place, a body that will not obey, water where water should not be. Whether these arise from common neurology or common storytelling is unsettled, but the practical consequence for a group show is that submissions converge. What differentiates the strong work is almost never the motif; it is the specificity of the room, the light and the person.

The Risk of the Dictionary

Every dream genre accumulates a symbol dictionary, and photography's version is well worn: clocks, mirrors, birds, keys, doorways, drifting fabric. These read as dreamlike because they have been used to mean dreamlike, which makes them efficient and empty. The alternative is not to avoid symbols but to refuse the ones already assigned meanings, and to let the strangeness come from arrangement instead. A perfectly ordinary object in a position it could not have reached does more work than any mirror.

Why the Theme Recurs

Dream and lucidity briefs return because they are the least prescriptive prompts a gallery can issue: they specify a state of mind rather than a subject, so the submissions describe the photographers more than the theme. TCG Gallery is an independent online photography gallery, and each juried exhibition remains part of a permanent public archive after its run ends, so these catalogs accumulate into a longer record than any single project. Photographers can enter the current photography open calls directly.

Sales and Artist Inquiries

Are you interested in making a purchase or connecting with one of the featured artists? Send us a message through our contact form, and we'll get back to you shortly.